<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim Hanlon &#187; Malvertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tim-hanlon.com/tag/malvertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tim-hanlon.com</link>
	<description>Whatever doesn't fit somewhere else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:28:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scareware (or malvertising) and tips for dealing with ad networks</title>
		<link>http://tim-hanlon.com/scareware-or-malvertising-and-tips-for-dealing-with-ad-networks</link>
		<comments>http://tim-hanlon.com/scareware-or-malvertising-and-tips-for-dealing-with-ad-networks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hanlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malvertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scareware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tim-hanlon.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just fought (and thankfully, won) a week-long battle against scareware (Google calls it malvertising) appearing on Gizmag, I wanted to do a brain dump of what I&#8217;ve learned along the way. Every time a user experiences this kind of &#8220;advertising&#8221;, it&#8217;s damaging the user&#8217;s experience, the site and its relationship with its readers, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just fought (and thankfully, won) a week-long battle against scareware (Google calls it <a href="http://www.anti-malvertising.com/" target="_blank">malvertising</a>) appearing on Gizmag, I wanted to do a brain dump of what I&#8217;ve learned along the way.</p>
<p>Every time a user experiences this kind of &#8220;advertising&#8221;, it&#8217;s damaging the user&#8217;s experience, the site and its relationship with its readers, the advertising network itself and the industry as a whole &#8211; no doubt a significant percentage of AdBlock installations have been a result of scareware. </p>
<p><span id="more-16"></span></p>
<p>&#8230;so it was an unpleasant surprise seeing how some of the networks we deal with responded to the problem once made aware of it. Of course, I&#8217;m contractually obliged not to reveal any specific details, but here&#8217;s some tips for when you&#8217;re thinking about jumping into bed with a new ad network:</p>
<ul>
<li>Be wary of networks who don&#8217;t give you the ability to see what advertising is running on your site and block specific advertisers or creative from running without their intervention.</li>
<li>Be wary of networks who don&#8217;t give you access to a publisher interface that allows you to change your default tags (tags from another ad network which will be displayed if this network can&#8217;t fill the impression) without their intervention.</li>
<li>Be wary of networks who won&#8217;t give you daily reports on creative delivery. Without this, you can&#8217;t see if they&#8217;re serving ads from a third-party remnant deal without letting you know.</li>
<li><strong>Do not</strong> sign any exclusive ad contracts without having a lawyer (who actually understands online advertising) go through it with you. Consider adding a clause that allows you to pull their tags in the event of inappropriate advertising appearing on your site. (Remember, contracts are negotiations.)</li>
</ul>
<p>Having said that, don&#8217;t take this as me saying &#8220;don&#8217;t sign up with a network that falls into any of those categories&#8221; &#8211; the best network we&#8217;ve been involved with to date doesn&#8217;t have a publisher interface. Just understand the risks involved with not having complete awareness and control of the advertising that is being served onto your site at all times.</p>
<p>In the end, I won the battle by cutting our ten-strong ad waterfall (a chain of ad networks that pass on impressions they can&#8217;t fill to the next network) down to two networks. Of course, the hundreds of thousands of impressions that are no longer being filled each day made quite a dent in our revenues, but the trust we&#8217;ve built with our 1.1 million readers over the last eight years is far more important.</p>
<p>I signed up at <a href="https://www.blackvpn.com/" target="_blank">BlackVPN</a>, who have a rock solid and reasonably priced VPN service that allows you to view your site as it would be viewed by a reader in the US, UK, Europe and the Netherlands (incredibly helpful for someone in Melbourne, Australia). This allowed me to experience the issue myself, and verify that we&#8217;d got it sorted, rather than relying on our readers for diagnostics.</p>
<p>&#8230;and I&#8217;ll leave you with another tip. You might run OS X, but always have a Windows machine handy for diagnostics. It appears that this particular attack relied on an Internet Explorer vulnerability. No surprises there, really. (Thanks again for Internet Explorer, Microsoft. You&#8217;ve left a stain on the internet that will take decades to clean up.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tim-hanlon.com/scareware-or-malvertising-and-tips-for-dealing-with-ad-networks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

